Jesus Christ was born in 1053 a.d. and crucified in 1086 a.d.
The Old Testament refers to mediaeval events.
Apocalypse was written after 1486 a.d.
Not quite what you have learned in school? This version of events is more substantiated by hard facts and logic - validated by new astronomical research and statistical analysis of ancient sources - than everything you have read and heard about history before.
The so-called consensual history is a finely woven magic fabric of intricate lies about events predating the XVI century. There is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that could be reliably and independently traced back earlier than the XI century. The archeological, dendrochronological, paleograph-ical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts are both non-exact and contradictory.
The dominating historical discourse in its current state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources, such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals have vanished in the Dark Ages and the allegedly irrefutable proof delivered by the late mediaeval astronomers, all cemented by the power of the ecclesial authorities. Nearly all of its components are blatantly untrue!
This is History in the Making
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.
Introducing the problem. A criticism of the Scaligerian chronology. Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs.
The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. A. T. Fomenko, V. V. Kalashnikov, G. V. Nosovskiy
Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy's Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs.
Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. A. T. Fomenko, G. V. Nosovskiy
Russia = Horde. Ottomans = Atamans. Europe. China. Japan. The Etruscans. Egypt. Scandinavia.
The Horde-Ataman Empire. The Bible. The Reformation. America. Passover and the calendar.
A reconstruction of global history. The Khans of Novgorod = The Habsburgs. Miscellaneous information. The legacy of the Great Empire in the history and culture of Eurasia and America.
This seven volume edition is based on a number of our books that came out over the last couple of years and were concerned with the subject in question. All this gigantic body of material was revised and categorized; finally, its current form does not contain any of the repetitions that are inevitable in the publication of separate books. All of this resulted in the inclusion of a great number of additional material in the current edition - including previously unpublished data. The reader shall find a systematic rendition of detailed criticisms of the consensual (Scaligerian) chronology, the descriptions of the methods offered by mathematical statistics and natural sciences that the authors have discovered and researched, as well as the new hypothetical reconstruction of global history up until the XVIII century. Our previous books on the subject of chronology were created in the period of naissance and rather turbulent infancy of the new paradigm, full of complications and involved issues, which often resulted in the formulation of multi-optional hypotheses. The present edition pioneers in formulating a consecutive unified concept of the reconstruction of ancient history - one that apparently is supported by a truly immense body of evidence. Nevertheless, it is understandable that its elements may occasionally be in need of revision or elaboration.
Was this article helpful?